>>20
I can only repeat:
"If magic existed then there would be a sufficient body of evidence to support it."
There is ZERO evidence that inscribing runes on ANYTHING imbues said object with power, motive or otherwise.
Also, you can find a gazillion fuzzy pictures and shaky video on the Internet, and those doesn't prove anything. "Things far away in the sky" don't constitute proof. Luckily for sensible men, we know that "things far away in the sky" are still subject to the same forces of entropy, hence they tend to FALL FROM THE SKY and produce physical evidence. Planes, balloons, birds, ice, water and stones do it all the fucking time. YET ... we don't have even ONE "Drone".
Hence, they're bullshit. Something that exists should provide evidence for its existence, and the more outlandish or pervasive it is, the more evidence it will (should) produce. When there's ZERO evidence, then the only rational conclusion is that the claim is bullshit.