Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Calculus BC

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-03 17:30 ID:OGvRLxiR

OK, this anon sucked BC Calculus pretty hard.  Anyone know of a good way to review BC along with AB?

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-03 17:53 ID:gnC84fiZ

1. Practice.
2. Practice.
3. Understand the rigorous definitions of the limit, the derivative, and the Riemann integral.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-03 17:55 ID:gnC84fiZ

PS WTF is this AC/BC BS? GTFO, underage&

Name: 4tran 2007-08-03 18:05 ID:GyP32s8m

AP exams do not test rigorous definitions of the limit.  A rigorous definition of the derivative will suffice (make sure you know how to calculate it).

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-03 19:33 ID:gnC84fiZ

>>4

OH REALLY? THEY DON'T MAKE YOU MEMORISE THE DELTA/EPSILON DEFINITION? I GUESS THERE'S NO POINT IN LEARNING IT THEN.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-03 21:49 ID:cGr1RwMM

If you're doing AP, gets of old AP practice tests. Really, the best thing you can do is practice--AP BC loves tricky questions. AND LURK MOAR

Name: 4tran 2007-08-04 1:53 ID:Heaven

>>5
Delta/epsilon = real analysis.  The AP exam does not require any delta/epsilon proofs.  The OP was concerned about the exams.  What moar do you want?

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-06 9:55 ID:CgiLuVld

The Riemann integral is less powerful than the Lebesgue integral. But I don't think anywhere actually teaches Lebesgue instead of Riemann, which is sad.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-06 11:26 ID:PJ/OPBHl

>>8
In the US, Lebesgue may not be taught until early graduate courses.  It's kind of sad.  The schools with stronger math departments teach Lebesgue near the end of the undergrad stream.

Of course, most applied disciplines don't bother with these classes. Engineers usually only take enough mathematics to get a "feel" for PDEs and (possibly) complex variables.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-06 13:35 ID:CgiLuVld

>>9
I'm surprised to hear it's taught anywhere at all: in the UK it's more or less unheard of unless you are in a specific research discipline that requires it. (I've a friend in complex dynamics and a friend in probability, and Riemann just doesn't cut it quite alot of the time so they need him; but they wouldn't otherwise I'm quite sure.)

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-06 14:42 ID:emjTBNJl

>>10
I'm doing maths at Cambridge uni, just completed my first year. It was mentioned to us as an alternative, during Analysis1 lectures, but that was all I've heard. Analysis2 may go into it a little, I'm not certain.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-06 15:15 ID:U5g97bok

>>11

Not from what my friends there have said.

Which college?

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-06 15:30 ID:h8DmBXlK

lol @ amerifags complaining about math, you probably have the best  math education in the world

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-06 15:54 ID:58cQoeQV

>>13

I'm Britfag -- they certainly do not.

At any point in the English higher education of mathematics, Americans can be as much as about 5 years behind.

And Russians seem to do very well.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-06 16:09 ID:0r/V7sqW

eastern european fag here. it's taught at uni level in the 3rd (of 4) year in a mandatory one semester course called 'measure theory'. it's also mentioned in analysis 1 (ooh look you can integrate over \Sigma_Q too bad most of you won't get there)

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-06 18:34 ID:gbRGY1Cl

Lebesgue integration is taught as one of the first topics in the Honors Analysis I course for first and second years at UChicago, which is an american uni.

And Lebesgue isn't the only integral. There's Darboux, Stieltjies, Bochner, Daniell, Ito, That other Russian faggot who did the other stochastic integral that chooses the midpoint instead of the endpoint in its integral definition (Ito integration chooses the endpoint for you newfags)... Lebesgue integral just happens to be one of the most convenient.

At its most general, an integral with respect to a measure is simply a linear functional from a function spcae with elements taking values on the measure space into this space. That's all. (Well, that's the Daniell view of integration, at least.)

SO LIGHTEN THE FUCK UP ABOUT LEBESGUE ITS NOT NECESSARILY THE BEST OR MOST GENERAL

Name: The Triscut 2007-08-07 5:01 ID:Yi6wSgY8

I've only taken the first semester test (I think that's AB right?) but I got a 5 on it and I think what helped me the most was taking a couple of the previous calculus tests to find out what I didn't know how to do and then figuring out how to do it. I had trouble with free response problems that were like your filling up a tank with this equation and you need to find out how fast the volume is increasing and how fast the hight of the water is increasing, but after doing 2 or 3 of those problems and spending some time on them I remembered how to do it on the real test.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-07 8:51 ID:EuXbTt0p

calculus B.C. (before christ) was all about GILGAMESH

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-07 9:56 ID:fgWZOnpa

>>11

lol what'd you get?
I've also just finished first year maths at trinity.

They did mention that we'd do lebesgue, probably in IB.

They said that it would integrate a function that is defined as 0 on all irrational points and 1 on all rational points between 0 and 1.
Common sense says the integral is 1, but it's undefined in riemann.


>>12

They probably either missed the lecture or weren't listening too hard, it was a real offhand comment

Name: 4tran 2007-08-07 13:42 ID:EMpy3LO8

>>19
I thought common sense would say that the integral is 0, since there are an uncountably infinite # of irrational numbers >> a countably infinite # of ratinal numbers?

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-07 14:20 ID:fgWZOnpa

>>20

lol, good point, I think that's a typo, or I just wasn't thinking at the time :p

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-07 14:25 ID:QeuHIlyj

I see there's a lot of Cambridge fags here. What A levels and age did you enter Cambridge with?

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-07 14:46 ID:fgWZOnpa

>>22

There seems to be two. I entered at 18, didn't take a gap year.

I took Maths, Further maths, physics and psychology at AS level then dropped psychology. Got A's.

The STEP exams are the things that count though, for maths. I think I'd still have trouble passing them again.

I got a II on step 2 and a S on step 3.
Grading goes III , II, I , S.
We were required to get a I in both, but I guess the S on 3 persuaded them.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-07 15:51 ID:nvs2TYZs

>>22
6 A-levels, I enterred when I was 17.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-07 16:01 ID:YsS9soOr

Read and do practice problems out of AP study guides.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-07 16:36 ID:fgWZOnpa

>>24

6, fucking hell overkill. You maths?
Some guy at my college did 10, I never got the point.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-07 16:45 ID:KTcusTl/

what are you limeys chit chatting about now?

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-07 18:04 ID:pi4VeA3/

>>20

For Riemann (and alot of the others) attempts at integration give silly and non-existant answers depending on how it is carried out.

I am awaiting my STEP grades.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-07 18:12 ID:pi4VeA3/

>>16

We're not being dark; we're just saying we like Lebesgue. You lighten the fuck up generally.


Name: Anonymous 2007-08-07 19:18 ID:fgWZOnpa

>>28
someone who knows about more than one theory of integration shouldn't really have much trouble with STEP. :p

You're not going to trinity are you?

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-07 19:31 ID:ZUWl2UJ4

>>30
as in Trinity College Dublin?

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-07 19:55 ID:fgWZOnpa

>>31
I don't believe trinity college dublin require STEP for entrance.

I could be wrong. I was referring to cambridge, obivously.

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-07 20:38 ID:7Nh5yte9

>>23

#11 here, sorry this is a bit overdue, I keep skipping over this thread because it's so boring! I didn't know there were any other 4channers from my year in uni, except another one that I know from Clare. Yeah I'm from Clare by the way, ha.

Nice work on the S in STEP 3. I got I in STEP3 and S in STEP2. How'd your exams go?

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-08 4:11 ID:eIzj6N2n

calculus B.C. (before christ) was all about GILGAMESH

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-08 4:12 ID:eIzj6N2n

calculus B.C. (before christ) was all about GILGAMESH

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-08 4:12 ID:eIzj6N2n

calculus B.C. (before christ) was all about GILGAMESH

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-08 4:12 ID:eIzj6N2n

calculus B.C. (before christ) was all about GILGAMESH

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-08 4:12 ID:eIzj6N2n

calculus B.C. (before christ) was all about GILGAMESH

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-08 4:12 ID:eIzj6N2n

calculus B.C. (before christ) was all about GILGAMESH

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-08 10:14 ID:XFvX6rph

>>33

I got a 1st, no idea how. I wasn't the lowest first in the year, but with 9 alphas I probably should have been :p

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List