>>91
I can only repeat, using your words as a base, what is perfectly true which you twentysomething rubes cannot wrap your minds around, to wit:
"Not having evidence does not necessarily imply negation of an existence unless that existence should be providing a preponderance of evidence."
I keep making that point over and over and over and over and over and over but you rubes continue to ignore it. What I said is
perfectly valid. The Gilgamesh thing is only one of the leading examples of WHY what I said is true.
I'm right, and I'm never going to stop until you infantile rubes go away or admit that I'm right.
There is no god. I don't care if that fact makes you simpering wimps cry yourselves to sleep every night as if your own fathers died; I'm right and the truth must prevail.