#8, you're continuing the abide by the doctrines of FAIL.
Harken well to my use of words: When you make claim, surely you have evidence to support it since SOMETHING rational must have convinced you. If it didn't, then you're just making things up.
And the followup: ABSURD CLAIMS require immediate proof or they are rightfully dismissed out of hand. (I.e. there is no Gilgamesh.)
HENCE (and follow along, here) ... when someone comes along and claims to have made an engine that runs on water alone, we are entirely rightful to dismiss those claims if PROOF OF SUCH A FUCKING ABSURDITY DOESN'T IMMEDIATELY FOLLOW. I don't need to "prove" engines don't run on water as a fuel since any fucking educated person knows they don't (or they should).
So, I must state it again: It's entire correct to state (without evidence) that an absurd claim is untrue SINCE IT'S FUCKING ABSURD AND UNSUPPORTED!
If people don't abide by that rule, then they are prone to believing things like a big Jew in the sky, or that 4chan builds knowledge, or that voting a party line is good for the country.
Finally, learn the differences in what we're discussing, jackhole. I can't rationally dismiss a claim if that claim is rational.