burden of proof

excuse for debate club fags and defendents in court, amirite?

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand once again, our dear RedCream fails to even understand the topic- confusing the relative simplicity of proving or disproving something, with the burden of proof itself.

There is a big difference, a goddamn five-year-old could understand it, but alas, for RedCream that simple distinction is maddeningly elusive.

Go away and talk to Gilgamesh for a while, the grown-ups are going to discuss BASIC FUCKING LOGIC and we wouldn't want you to hurt your little brain trying to comprehend it.