excuse for debate club fags and defendents in court, amirite?
Name:
Anonymous2007-08-12 5:36 ID:MGPmvzfQ
This is the most simple shit ever.
The OP composes an argument and provides proof. A critic then points out a flaw in the OP's reasonning and/or questions the proof provided. The next person to criticise should do the same as the 1st critic.
If anyone strays from this course then the entire argument is a troll flame and leads nowhere.
Example.
*1*
troll: NIGGERS ARE INFERIOR
critic: prove it
troll: LOL TEH BURDAN OF PROOF IS ON U KIKE!!!