Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

burden of proof

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-01 2:55 ID:NrqcfiTS

excuse for debate club fags and defendents in court, amirite?

Name: RedCream 2007-08-09 8:28 ID:vfJ412Oq

>>58
Are we going to have to go all through this again, stupid fuckwad?  Follow along as well as your college-created mental blocks allow:

FACT: The evidence for a universe-shitting bowel is ZERO.

FACT: The probability of detecting such an enormous aberration is ONE.

THEREFORE:  Those facts PROVE there is no such thing as a "universe-shitting bowel".

There are no huge invisible, levitating dragons tiptoeing through your garden at night, leaving no footprints, you fucking MORON!  The absence of evidence MEANS that such an OUTLANDISH creature doesn't exist!

This is the same point I make over and over and over and over and over and over to you stupid twentysomething fuckos, but you continue to insist (from your college-structured brain-damage) on a precise definition of so-called logic that simply doesn't apply ... and will never apply when the object in question should be HUGELY OBVIOUS AND SWAMPING US WITH EVIDENCE!

IN SHORT ... things that EXIST are EVIDENCE-PRODUCERS.  Anyone who insists otherwise are not only deranged but FAIL FAIL FAIL since applicable logic says that they are using evidential procedures to make the claim in the first place!

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List