This thread is about the BURDEN OF PROOF, you fucking chanfags! In the real world outside a textual treatment of logic, absurd claims do NOT justify themselves by challenging you to find their suspiciously missing proof!
It's better in most cases to be approximately right than exactly wrong. Chanfag #26 is using extreme precision to achieve the exactly wrong result in the broader argument. In the broader argument, "debate club fags and defendents in court" cannot make absurd claims without providing evidence for their assertions. PERIOD. If you fuckasses really think differently, then good luck on your day in court. I herd u liek jail.