Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

burden of proof

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-01 2:55 ID:NrqcfiTS

excuse for debate club fags and defendents in court, amirite?

Name: RedCream 2007-08-19 14:14 ID:ZI5nhHGC

This is most excellent and fine.  Not only are the twentysomething overeducated wankers still trying to justify their ghei belief in a nonexistent godthing, but they've gotten so hot under their collars that they're blaming other anons for being me.  SWEET!

Well, to be fair, although a case of mistaken identity, at least that's a sane conclusion.  We have evidence of the existence of a RedCream, and it's rational to conclude that a RedCream can exist on this board.  In high contrast, there's ZERO evidence for a giant alien space monster, and there should be GREAT GOBS of it ... hence there's no giant alien space monster anywhere.

Now that's the cue for one of the twentysomething overeducated wankers -- deep in their mewling fear of a godless universe -- to step in and wave a book on logic as if it will magically bring their desired divinity into existence.

And Americans still wonder why their education systems suck 'nadbag.

P.S.  Puff the Fucking Magic Dragon doesn't exist, either, for utterly the same reasons why Jehovah doesn't.  Big dragons leave evidence around of their existence.  Therefore ... ah, you've all heard that before.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List