>>22
Why do you propose that children learn analysis before linear/abstract algebra? Given that the latter is far simpler, I'd argue for the opposite.
Punctuation, grammar, syntax, and vocabulary are all critical to a proper understanding of the English language, and all students should be required to know these things thoroughly. However, the utility of interpreting literature is far less. This symbolism/allegory/allusion stuff isn't very useful, but it does give one a slightly different perspective on literature. Harry Potter isn't just a young wizard attempting to defeat a great evil. At the same time, a working class protagonist tripping over a log doesn't always mean that the log represents the bourgeoisie oppressing him.
>>24
I can't wait either.
>>28
Orly? I thought it was the other way around.
>>32
I'll read moar.
>>33
Proof plox?
I will read/respond to rest at a later time.