>>50
care to elaborate why its retarded to specify what definition of 'god' you are arguing against?
"Some definitions of God's existence are so non-specific that it is certain that something exists that meets the definition; in stark contrast, there are suggestions that other definitions are self-contradictory. " (wikipedia)
i was simply pointing out, that instead of lumping all definitions of god into a single word, it would be better to specify which definition of god you're arguing against. There are far more arguments that can be made against the existence of a theistic god, than say, the concept of 'god' that einstein had or even some forms of god in hinduism.