>>10
Why do people say this? It's the fucking opposite.
There's no evidence of the existence of giant pink dragons. That means there is evidence against the existence of giant pink dragons.
That's why people are innocent until proven guilty. If the phrase "The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence" is true, then people could be sent to jail purely because they've been accused of a crime, regardless of whether or not there's any evidence to prove that they've committed said crime.
Then you'd have to accept the existance of a god just because there's no evidence to prove that there ISN'T a god, and then you'd have to accept the evidence that my fucking pink dragon exists, just because you can't prove that it doesn't.