>>32
Ok, so you're just bending definitions.
my pet peeve is atheists who tell me that they are right. i ask them, what proof do you have?
Of course there are atheists who don't fully understand the philosophical issues.
i have yet to see proof in favor of either conslusion.
It all depends on what kind of proof you want, and how you define the concept of 'god'. Some types of gods cannot logically exist, some are scientifically improbable, etc.
an atheist believes it is not possible for a god to exist.
No, they believe that it's at least unlikely; 'scientifically impossible'. And, again, it depends on what kind of god you're talking about.
At best, agnosticism is a meaningless philosophical observation, at worst, it's intellectually lazy fence-sitting.