>>230
yes, the same point i made can be written to say the same thing about every single mythological creature, in fact, anything, any made up piece of shit you can ever imagine. that was exactly the point in the last few posts. because it was a variable that you can stick anything in for. anything.
relatedly, i didn't say anything was real. if you had half a fucking clue what you were talking about, you'd recognize that. because, you know, you can fucking stick anything in there, and it didn't say anything about whether or not it actually exists. it just had assumed conditionals about what would be the case IF it did or didn't.
i explained why a fallacy was a fallacy. you apparently don't know how to read, and don't understand what a variable is. so, in conclusion, no. go home.