>>193
You can't sanely debate about things yet found by science, since you're just indulging in fiction. On top of that, something as outrageous as the indicated dragon has no precedent. That's a double strike against your musings being considered sane.
You don't need "total knowledge" to dismiss BULLSHIT.
And finally, the correctness of a self-evidency applies to everyone, like it or not. You're just demonstrating your insanity, dishonesty or obstinence. Which is it, fuckcake?