>>179
FAIL. The existence of the universe is not proof of a PREFERRED creation method. You cannot make such a claim of yours and remain rational, you fucking religifreak.
>>180
FAIL. When you make an outrageous claim, the onus of proof is upon YOU.
>>181
FAIL. We live in a universe where large things produce a lot of evidence, and pervasive things also produce a lot of evidence. Therefore,
a large, pervasive thing like a "giant alien space monster" should be producing a LOT of evidence.
Only children and mental incompetents like Christians believe in a invisible, weightless, odorless, incorporeal dragon that tiptoes through their garden at night. The rational man knows that anything ascribed as "invisible, weightless, odorless, incorporeal" is much more likely to simply NOT EXIST. If you don't believe in such a dragon but are quick to point out that there's some sort of chance it exists, then you're just a GAYTHEIST -- you don't have the backbone or balls to stand against the religifucks on what is a clear case for the nonexistence of divinities.
>>182
WIN. Russell is talking REAL SENSE, unlike the gaythiests and religitards who frequent this board.