>>177
No, the existence of this god relies upon past events which haven't re-occurred and in fact don't even seem to occur once the cameras and other recording equipment arrive on the scene. On top of that, the existence of a universe-spanning entity should as be fairly easy to prove as any other astronomical entity is. In extreme contrast, we have ZERO EVIDENCE.
Hence, it's fairly clear:
This "god" as popularly envisioned simply doesn't exist. It should be producing a lot of evidence, but we have nothing.
Q.E.D. (Of course, the religiqueers can't admit that, and continue to insist that LOGIC GAMES support their case. What a sad bunch of farcical people!)