>>125
You don't seem to understand *what* I'm saying. What I'm saying is Christian dogma doesn't belong in government (nor in the science classroom, for that matter) because it is not established fact; it's far-fetched and unsubstantiated, so it shouldn't dictate what the rest of us can and cannot do, and should not be taught as fact in schools. Don't you agree? I thought you said you were an agnostic; a non-theist. You're defending theists an awful lot for an a non-theist. These people have imposed their superstitious lifestyle upon you; dictated what you are and aren't allowed to do, based on their irrational beliefs. Are you going to stand for that? Doesn't it bother you? The way I see it, these people do not deserve our support. They are in the wrong, and they need to be reminded of that. By speaking in their defense you only reassure them, in their minds, that they're right, so leave it to them to defend their own faith. If they can't, well then they ought to do the sensible thing and discard their superstitions and get them out of government. I guarantee Christians would not let people of other worldviews get away with the crap they're pulling right now. So why should we let Christians get away with it? Screw "religious tolerance" and all that. They would NOT show us the same courtesy that we are expected to show them, if it was the other way around.