>>115
i'll take the time to quickly address them, but i sincerely doubt you'd give what i say any critical consideration, because you've come off as someone with either an agenda or a large set of preconceived unwavering beliefs.
1) you've intentionally misrepresented the notion of the abrahamic God as a fabricated giant space monster. regardless of the validity of your misrepresentation, our discussion was about the existence of a god, with emphasis on the current christian notion, or at least something with omnipotence, omniscience, and omnibenevolence.
2) i don't know where you got your ideas on what proof is and what requires proof. you can make any assertion you want and you don't have to prove shit. you can claim youre the spaceking ixxkeput of nebulon 48-r and you don't have to prove it. i just won't believe you until i see proof. if you want to convince me, then there has to be proof. you yourself don't even have to provide it. i just have to see it at some point, then i'll be convinced.
3) for some reason, regarding the one possibly sarcastic guy who claimed that god is unprovable, you called him stupid. i'm not sure why, since i doubt you have proof that god is provable, and you certainly didn't provide it if you do. so, until we know that god is provable or disprovable, and you have a proof for or against god, you can only have an opinion on it.
4) "The assertions of the existence of this 'god' continue to go 100% unproved. Hence, they are WRONG."
this thread and others like it have already addressed several times why this is a retarded thing to say. i'll invite you to read through the thread, and as a bonus, i'll tell you to inspect a list of logical fallacies.
5) "After all, if you assert that some sort of deity exists, you must have detected it somehow, right?"
The following are two possibilities, there are more:
It's been detected by means of the human body not readily repeatable in a scientific setting with a body or other instruments.
Someone made it up.
In any case, it doesn't follow from an assertion that there was any good reason for that assertion other than an imagination and what caused that person to write/speak. Now, you personally have made up some retarded arguments, so I guess by your own logic, you should be strapped to a table in a padded room for having an imagination.
6) many definitions of religion do not necessitate a higher power of any form, though many emphasize it, and some require it. go look it up in a couple different sources, such as the ones that don't conform to your convenience.
7)you're not right. you're just an arrogant jackass. if you were arrogant and right, i wouldn't care. even if you were arrogant and wrong but you justified what you said, i wouldn't mind much. the same things that allow people to be wrong: a lack of critical examination, belief without proof, etc, are things you seem to be familiar with yourself. i just happen to think you're guessing in favor of a better side. unfortunately, i think you're a terrible representative of this side in any sort of argument, because you're an idiot, and you argue like an idiot.
8) i didn't expect you to leave. i just wanted to express my disapproval of you. though i doubt that means anything to you either. for all i know, you could have some sort of social disorder where the views of others are completely meaningless to you as far as determining your own behavior.
9) you've already repeated your points, which i guess you've already acknowledged, since you said "continue repeating" rather than just "repeating".
10) cocks.
ok your turn :D