>>23
>>15 here.
Might just be me, but it seemed like you're just talking babble.
It's not a limitation of our number system, it's merely an anomaly that occurs due to how we define the real numbers. All it means is that all rational numbers instead of having a unique decimal expression, have two. And it's easily solved by just picking one of the two either .999....~ or 1.000~ and using it for every decimal expansion.
lol, looked up nullity theory, I assume that guy did it for the lulz.
Why do we want infinitesimals?
I don't see it as a limitation, just a property of the real numbers.
In fact the existence of a real "infinitesimal" I'm pretty certain would lead to all sorts of contradictions.