Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Bijection: R -> R*

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-04 20:34 ID:YBDeww2/

ITT bijections from the reals to the non-zero reals. I'm stumped.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-04 21:06 ID:YBDeww2/

Got one:

f(x): R -> R*

        _
       /
       |  x -> 1/(x+1) , x < -1
f(x) = <
       |  x -> x + 1 , x > -1
       \_

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-04 21:07 ID:YBDeww2/

fuck. (undefined for -1). back to the old drawing board.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-04 21:09 ID:9+ZlAEDs

>>1
Let {a_n} be a sequence of non-zero real numbers. Define the function f(x) as follows: if x = 0, f(x) = a_1. If x = a_i, f(x) = a_(i+1). Otherwise, f(x) = x.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-04 21:17 ID:Q7zn7vT6

x -> x, x not integer
x -> x + 1, x integer less than -1
x -> x + 2, x integer greater than or equal to -1

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-04 21:23 ID:Q7zn7vT6

>>5
go ahead, praise me.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-04 21:31 ID:YBDeww2/

>>6

Praise be to you?

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-04 21:33 ID:Q7zn7vT6

>>7
thank you, it was delicious.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-04 22:05 ID:9+ZlAEDs

>>5
Congratulations on taking my suggestion and obfuscating it.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-04 23:11 ID:KyMDjkPG

>>4
>>9
Your sequence needs more restrictions than simply non-zero elements; namely all a_i need to be distinct.

OP needed only an example, so there was no need for the generalization to an arbitrary sequence; >>5's solution was sufficient.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-05 0:06 ID:u4pQEqJn

>>9

rolled, bitch.

^___________________________________^;;

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-05 10:27 ID:yBdPXsM/

needs more simplicity, faggots

x -> x + 1, x is a non-negative integer
x -> x, otherwise

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-05 12:23 ID:u4pQEqJn

>>12
Congratulations on taking my suggestion and obfuscating it.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-05 15:22 ID:stIL7sDw

x --> e^x

Cocks

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-05 15:45 ID:Heaven

>>14
nonzero != positive

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-05 15:59 ID:Heaven

>>15
Congratulations on taking my suggestion and obfuscating it.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-05 17:20 ID:u4pQEqJn

>>14
nuclear failsion

Name: 4tran 2007-06-05 19:16 ID:Heaven

Why is everybody complaining of obfuscation?  The new examples are LESS obfuscated than the originals...

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-18 2:48

I wants lots and lots of some delectable pot!

Marijuana MUST be legalized.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List