Only a faggot would make that post. By Godel's incompleteness theorem, that is undecidable in any non-trivial formal system equivalent to number theory.
>>4 >>2 said that >>1's theorem is undecidable correct? So I just made it an axiom so it is always true that >>1 is a faggot. Of course it has yet to be shown that a formal system that contains a faggot is consistent.
Name:
Anonymous2007-05-07 6:24 ID:ICj1kirC
in b4 nullity & inconsistency
Name:
Anonymous2007-05-07 6:26 ID:FSeGzDHg
nullity
Name:
Anonymous2007-05-07 13:16 ID:AbdarGHs
inconsistency
Name:
Anonymous2007-05-07 13:21 ID:FRC0Bx21
&
Name:
Anonymous2007-05-07 20:29 ID:nJ13HK3B
Name:
Anonymous2007-05-08 0:39 ID:HLRO/MaJ
in after ampersand
Name:
Anonymous2009-03-18 2:26
I'm feeling really keen, for some of that good ol' green