Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

.99999 repeating = 1

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-18 15:23

x= .999 repeating
10x = 9.999 repeating
10x-x = 9.999 repeating - .999 repeating
9x= 9
x=1

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-21 21:36 ID:XgzBPAZO

>>40
Fail.

.999...=1 - First Mistake.
Putting a 1 after the ... in 0.000.. - Second Mistake.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-21 22:56 ID:yXM2Rzjs

>>40
It doesn't work that way.

>>37
Physics aren't math, they are simply an application of math.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-21 23:00 ID:0MxcYJBe

duh 0.000...1 = nullity mathfags

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-21 23:09 ID:xo6mgDQP

>>40

NO NO NO

0.00... means 0 WITH INFINITELY MANY ZEROS AFTER IT, SO ITS EQUAL TO 0

YOU DUMB FUCKS ARE DRIVING ME CRAZY. IF YOU STILL DONT GET IT JUST GO LEARN MATH FOR A COUPLE OF YEARS AND COME BACK

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-21 23:27 ID:f1AaW16/

>>44
Wrong. 0.000... means 0 + 0.0 + 0.00 + ... + 0.0001 which is not equal to 0, dumb fuck. lern2math plz

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-22 1:22 ID:kjwB4oM4

>>40
0*10^n will always be zero, so you can add as many zeroes as you want to a number without changing its value (and therefore without changing it).

As for 0.000...1, that is a malformed number and has no meaning. Consider .123...4, where the ellipsis still represents an infinite number of digits. Each digit is multiplied by 10 to some n proportional to its distance and direction from the decimal point, so .123... can be represented as (1*10^-1)+(2*10^-2)+(3*10^-3)+.... What is n for the 1 in .000...1? The correct application of that hotel thing from earlier tells us that it can't be infinity.

Alternatively, I challenge you to write this number - write an infinitely long string of zeroes, and then put a 1 at the end of it. If you manage to do so, well, that wasn't a very infinite string, was it?

>>43
Troll. That crap where the teacher supposedly tried to create a number for the reciprocal of zero does nothing to resolve the conflict, since 0*(1/0) would equal 0*(nullity), which would still be required to equal both 0 and 1 by 0x=0 and n/n=1.

>>45
Where did you come up with that 1, boy?

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-22 1:52 ID:zOH+l+YR

>>45
It doesn't work that way, you can't have a one after infinitely many zeroes. Think about that for a bit.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-22 8:51 ID:Jf9eh6y4

>>46
0*0=infinity

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-22 13:56 ID:kjwB4oM4

>>48
0x=0 for all x ∈ ℝ (ℂ, too, unless there's an exception I am missing.)

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-22 18:03 ID:f+L8Wtr8

This thread proves that math sucks.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-22 23:03 ID:kjwB4oM4

>>50
This thread proves that the average person is not qualified to speak about math.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-23 14:34 ID:qwl1UYde

0.9999recurring is just a different string for the same value. it just so happens that the decimal number system is crude when it comes to representing such values

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-23 15:50 ID:cjWS/YOi

>>52
There's nothing wrong with decimal. If you think there is something difficult about .999..., you just fail at math.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-23 16:36 ID:+STHOy9U

>>53
I'm not >>52
Although it should be noted that decimals are just estimations. The rational numbers can be expressed as a fraction, and the irrationals can generally be expressed by some infinite series and then estimated to the digits necessary.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-23 17:29 ID:PxOGa7sl

>>54
A decimal is not at all an estimation. Each one specifies a specific value. You can have a decimal specifying a value which ITSELF is an approximation (ie, 3.14159 ~= pi), but as I said, it is the value which is an approximation here, not the decimal - the decimal is specifying one single real number.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-23 19:05 ID:cjWS/YOi

>>55
Amen. All real numbers unambiguously represent a single quantity.

Not uniquely, though. That's the whole point of this topic.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-23 20:09 ID:Heaven

OH WOW, I'VE NEVER SEEN THIS TOPIC BEFORE!!! *gasp*

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-23 20:25 ID:cjWS/YOi

>>57

The fact that this is the classic math troll has already been established. Kindly go fuck yourself.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-23 23:26 ID:MQuf7/CZ

>>55
A decimal is what thou dost experience with thine eye, but the number is not what thou dost experience with thine eye, but experience with thine mind.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-24 3:55 ID:Heaven

a theory da!

And you experience 1/3rd all the time. It's hidden in nature

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-25 13:27 ID:4r+iqfr/

x = .999 repeating
10x = 9.9999 repeating
10x - 2x = 9.999999 repeating - 1.88888888 repeating
8x = 8.1111111111
x = 1.0138888888888888

A dur-hur-hur.

It doesn't equal one, it just gets so close to 1 that after a certain point, the difference is arbitrary on all levels.

Learn the concept of infinity, tards.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-25 14:12 ID:Heaven

>>61
0.9 + 0.9 = 1.8
0.99 + 0.99 = 1.98
0.999 + 0.999 = 1.998
..
0.999... + 0.999... = 1.999...

Nice job adding. gb2/gradeschool/ useless faggot.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-25 16:18 ID:G3PMhTNL

>>62

HUMILIATION

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-25 18:37 ID:Heaven

>>2 - >>63
yhbt

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-25 22:17 ID:QvS92HeP

>>64
We know!

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-25 22:26 ID:k4ccEiDE

wtf, my thread is still going, everyone please shut the fuck up now, I regret making this. and .9999 doesn not equal one, i changed my mind

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-25 23:04 ID:Heaven

very good, topic done.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-26 0:07 ID:Z64rdbNq

>>66
Why would that END the thread?

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-26 7:07 ID:beEuLrzo

0.999999999r=1.000000000r
0.999999998r=0.999999999r
0.999999989r=0.999999990r
0.999999899r=0.999999900r
0.999998999r=0.999999000r
0.999989999r=0.999990000r
0.999899999r=0.999900000r
0.998999999r=0.999000000r
0.989999999r=0.990000000r

BUT THE PROBLEM OCCURS CAUSE
1.000r = 0.999r + (1.000r-0.999r)
and 1.000r = 0.999r + (1.000r-0.999r) + (1.000r-0.999r) etc, onto infinity.

ALL NUMBERS ON THE REAL NUMBER LINE WELL END UP EQUAL TO EACH OTHER! SINCE EVERY REAL NUMBER IS EQUAL TO IT'S
INFINITELY CLOSE NEXT NUMBER, ETC.
I can't explain this well as I am not a mathematician, but real number line is epic fail!

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-26 7:09 ID:beEuLrzo

Oh and to clarify my post, I know that 1.000r-0.999r is infinitely small, but what happens when you add an infintely small number an infinite amount of times....that's right every number on the real number line is equal to each other....cats and dogs living together!

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-26 7:35 ID:beEuLrzo

1.000r = 0.999r so therfore 1.000r - 0.999r = 0
thus 1.000r = 0.999r + (1.000r-0.999r)
and  1.000r = 0.999r + 2 x (1.000r-0.999r), x3, x4, etc. onto eternity
BUT    1.000r = 0.999r + (1.000r-0.999r) x infinity
IF    1 / inifinty = 0, then 1.000r - 0.999r = 1 / infinity
SO    1.000r = 0.999r + infinity x (1 / infinity)
infinity x (1 / infinity), the infinities cancel out so you are left with 1 / 1

1.000r = 0.999r + 1 / 1

1 = 1.999r
1 = 2 WTF!!!!!!!!!!!
EVERY NUMBER ON THE REAL NUMBER LINE IS EQUAL TO EACH OTHER FAGGOTS!!!!!

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-26 8:35 ID:kEEH1GJY

>>69

>0.999999999r=1.000000000r
Correct

>0.999999998r=0.999999999r
No you fucking moron.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-26 8:52 ID:beEuLrzo

>>72
>0.999999998r=0.999999999r
By 0.99999998r, I mean 0.9999999989999r, with repeating 9's after the 8.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-26 10:00 ID:+19sjABh

CAN'T DIVIDE BIJ INFINITY, GTFO

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-26 10:41 ID:Heaven

>>71
infinity isn't a number.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-26 10:45 ID:kEEH1GJY

>>73
Doesnt fucking matter
0.999999899.. = 0.9999999000..

GET IT YET?

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-26 16:09 ID:XyXjtRlf

0.000...1 is not valid notation, and is not interpretable as a real number according to traditional decimal notation.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-26 16:28 ID:D4l+7ooh

0.999~ = 1.  Stop this argument.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-26 17:30 ID:Heaven

Why the fuck is this thread still alive?
0.999.. = 1
End of fucking story. If you don't understand, go get a fucking education.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-26 21:56 ID:e7Jw2Rtp

infinity divided by infinity is a degenerate form and can equal anything because guess what, INFINITY IS NOT A NUMBER. It is a concept that is used to understand things. Here's a short and informal proof of why infinity is not a natural number:

For inifinity equals the largest natural number,
Let w equal the very largest number of the natural numbers. Add one to w. w < w + 1. Therefore w is not the largest number. Therefore, any "number" that could actually be larger than itself is not a natural number.

For your information: 0/0, infinity/infinity, 1^infinity, 0^0, infinity - infinity and a whole host of others are degenerate forms and can literally be ANY number.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List