Why Science cannot create life currently

The reason life cannot currently simply be created, even though we understand enough of it to be able to do so theoretically, is because the chemical molecules are so huge and interconnected (complex, but mainly due to sheer size, yet we can still grasp them intellectually) that it is nearly impossible to create such compounds in sufficient amounts to "create" life, and the fact that "programming" life, e.g. creating or copying genetic code, is such a hit or miss process, that most things would simply fail to achieve "life" or die soon after (as is the majority of such events in nature as well, life doesnt function well by itself)

To better illustrate the point, think of life as a self replicating and self sustaining computer program, with the source code as DNA, but then think of the source code as something which can be changed and affected by just about anything coming into contact with it, and that furthermore it is constantly replicating and copying itself billions of times a day, often without regard to copying errors or changes in the code, and that in order to reproduce to create another version of itself, it must either divide and recopy, or combine its source code with the source code of another program to create a whole new set of source code, often without regard to how well such source code is written, designed, and checked for errors.

Couldnt scientists take different parts of the genetic codes of different animals and splice them together to make odd new creatures? Like chimeras and such! That would be so interesting.

Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost.

hahaha win

>>3
So... if I become an hero, I can make a person, 'soul' and all?

>>5
No, its like this: If you cut off a finger, you'll grow another cock.

>>6
I wholeheartedly disagree with the assertion that a finger is equal in value to a cock.

Then again/also, the value of a second cock is largely dependent on where it gets placed. I see potential for 'above/below the first one' and 'forehead', but not so much for 'inside of the thigh' and 'elbow/weenis'.

>>3
Damn, why the fuck did you use the funimation ver.

People cannot gain anything without sacrificing something. You must present something of equal value to gain something. That is the principle of equivalent trade in alchemy.

>>6
No, if you cut off your cock 2 will grow in it's place and you will get double the masculinity and pleasure. Try it.

>>9

Until Hercules' punk ass comes along and burns the severed penis stub so that the 2 new ones can't grow back.

>>8
Because it's better English, maybe?

>>9
My groin hurts... how long is this process supposed to take?

I made life. I ate cake and dribbled on my pillow. It turned to mould.

I call him simon.

>>13
Lol Win