Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

A l'il argument

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-02 15:10

Cunts are sex organs.
Cocks are sex organs.
therefore, cunts=cocks.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-02 15:24

Way to go. Now nobody's going to want to fuck, 'cause know now they know cunts and cocks are the same thing.

Nice job killing off the human race in one generation. Asshole.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-02 15:45

           ∧_∧   / ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄
          ( ´∀`) < post funny quotes!
        /    |    \
       /       .|      ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄
       / "⌒ヽ |.イ |
   __ |   .ノ | || |__
  .    ノく__つ∪∪   \
   _((_________\
    ̄ ̄ヽつ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ | |

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-02 17:39

lol gb2/predicate logic/

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-02 18:25

But how does this relate to the concerns of the black man in America?

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-04 2:41

>>5
It means he doesn't have to worry about passing on his genese and fucking up the rest of the world more than it already is.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-04 13:26

Just for the sake of disproving your fantastic argument, (and I hope I don't screw up my formal logic, it's been a while since I've had to use it)

"cunts/cocks equal sex organs" is not an equivalence relationship, as these are both sets, and while the set of cunts/cocks belongs in the set of sex organs, the set of sex organs does not belong in cunts or cocks, and so they do not equal each other through your argument, otherwise your argument would be perfectly legitimate, and we would all be in a spot of bother.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-06 19:15

OP = dumbarse
>>3 = dumbarse

OP = >>3?

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List