Please help with images in LaTeX

I created a .eps file with Adobe Illustrator.
Using the graphicx package, I tried to include the graphic but it keeps giving me noboudingbox errors. however if you open the eps in notepad the bounding box parameters ARE there. I searched the internet but found no solution. please help.

set the bounding box parameters.

HTML+CSS2 motherfucker, do you use it?

>>3
fail.

>>4
Fail more for using backwards shit instead of widespread, portable standards.

moar liek XHTML+CSS2+SVG

>>5
latex is for printing, gayxhtml is for screen. it's stupid to recommend one for the other. also sgml/xml markup sucks.

>>7
Printing is for losers. Also, I like my trees where they are. And no, I'm not a tree hugging hippy; I just happen to like a forest better than a desert. Also, I like pres butan to find, pres butan to syntax colour, and pres butan to change font face/size because author may be stupid or have a terrible taste. Also, I like to have everything at a few key strokes, not have to archive books somewhere then find them, and I like to spend little space.

I agree that SGML/XML-like markup sucks, but it's standard, and it's a good model that allows you to make everything proportional (percentages or em-relative) or pixel-perfect, depending on your preference or needs. You can make quite good  stylesheets for printing (in fact, a good stylesheet is device-independent; at most you can use @media stuff).

>>8
When we say "printing" in the context of LaTeX, we do not mean "printing out a webpage."

Protip: your physics textbook wasn't written with XML.

>>9
My physics book was my physics textbook because I couldn't get a digital version of it. It would have been easier to browse and find information in that way.

>>10
LaTeX can output to pdf. And it's much easier to work with than web standards like MathML.

Of course, that's why web standards are web standards and print standards are print standards.

yep. latex can output to pdf and support crossreferencing inside the pdf as well, so if it says theorem 3.1 you dont have to go around looking for it. you just click on it and it gets you there.

Whoever bashes latex obviously hasn't tried it out yet. go back to your microsoft equation editor lol