Ontological Argument for the Existance of God

1. God is that than which nothing greater can be conceived.
2. It is greater to be necessary than not.
3. God must be necessary.
4. God exists

Logically speaking, God MUST exist. But what God actually IS, no one really knows. He can be energy, mass, or some sort of spiritual being. All of these three fulfill the description: cannot be created nor destroyed.

All that's great and whatnot.

But even if this non-empyrical reality which you guys argue does indeed exist... who the fuck cares?

We can't touch it, we can't interact with it, we don't even exist in the same "plane of existance" as it.

yeah, great... there's a "God" that exists beyond the tangiable. If we cannot interact with it, so fucking what if it does exist?

Don't give me that bs about prayers reaching the ears of god. 7 billion people on earth would make a very fucking loud and indiscernable buzz to the ears of whatever being can hear.

We would be as intangable to "God" as "God" is to us.

And cut the crap on the "divine powers" bit. The phrase: "God helps those who help themselves" is the biggest steaming pile of bullshit I've ever heard. Anyone who puts forth the time and effort will reap the rewards.