>>93
You're only saying that because it just seems so absurd. What you fail to realize is that the concept of "god" is pretty much just as absurd.
Do what 91 said and apply it to those arguments for the existance of god. Replace every instance of "god" with "flying spaghetti monster" and you'd realize that not many of them could be disproved, even though there's probably no such thing as a flying wad of pasta roaming about.