>>63
>And these "same person" posts offer oh-so-much to the conversation at hand, other than stating (by your defination) that those people share the same mindset...
Yes and thats why the people are refered to as various derogatory names, trolls, bfags and what have you.
>There's nothing wrong with voicing agreement with someone else... or do you -always- have something to add when you find yourself in agreement with another?
Oh there's nothing wrong with not adding to the discussion on a discussion board thread, unless you feel there's something wrong with posts that say same person. Because posts that merely agree and bring nothing more to the table will always result in those posts that say same person. It certainly helps explain WHY one posting agreement agrees with the post in better clarity while avoiding shitty one-line responses (and so too are the "I just agree" posts one-liners) and at the same time continuing to fuel active discussion.
But go ahead, post more one line agreements and complain two posts later when the next post says same person. If you ask me, such simple agreement posts would be better off unposted.