>>30
"just as sqrt(2) is not fully computable."
0, as a real number, is not "fully computable" by that definition, since it requires infinite memory to store all of the digits and infinite time to write them. The same goes for any real number. "Fully computable" is a concept you have just made up out of a lack of understanding of the subject. I reiterate that I am talking about whether or not the universe is computable, which is the subject as initially brought up by
>>14. You seem to be talking about whether or not the universe is a DFA, which is a different issue.