>>111
Well, I would expect you to be the one giving me explainations since you are going against current scientific theory. But, alas, I will feed you once at least.
H
=On question 1:
The theory of Gravity was produced by Newton, the mechanics of which were discribed by Newtons law of universal gravitation. Here is a translation of Newton's own words: "Every point mass attracts every other point mass by a force pointing along the line intersecting both points. The force is proportional to the product of the two masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the point masses"
There you go, gravity is a field force, according to the Theory of Gravity. This is the equation/relationship used in most introductory phy textbooks, and the definition of gravity. If you were not a 4channel I would not have even bothered with that, but some of you guys are uh, search engine challenged.
=On point two, why gravity does not exist:
Since you seem to be very handicapped in this area, let me define for you a term called the Inertial frame of reference:
"If a system of coordinates K is chosen so that, in relation to it, physical laws hold good in their simplest form, the same laws hold good in relation to any other system of coordinates K' moving in uniform translation relatively to K."
In the physical law we will consider is Newtons Laws, specifically F=ma. This law says that any force acting on an object will produce an acceleration dependent not only on the force, but on the mass of the object that is being accelerated. Now, lets see if we say an object falling on Earth follows this law. We will see that acceleration from "gravity" is constant, and does not change with the mass of the object.
This is not a property of true forces, as I have shown you, but it IS a property of what are known as fictitious forces.
As Einstein astutly noted, "gravitation force" is actually the product of a noninertial frame (accelerating frame) being taken as an inertial frame. This produces an apparent "force" in which all objects are accelerated by this force at the same rate, what is known as "gravity".
Einstein then noted:
"we [...] assume the complete physical equivalence of a gravitational field and a corresponding acceleration of the reference system." (Einstein 1907)
Saying that any reference system experiencing acceleration is physically equiv (indestinguishable) to a "gravitational field" within that frame.
"But 112! What causes this apparent acceleration that causes us to invent forces like gravity?", you ask?
Well, this is where GR comes in, in it Einstein showed that mass inertacts with space-time (discribed by different tensors) and changes it, space time in turn has an effect on mass and causes objects within it to accelerate toward the mass. See, no forces involved! (This is a kindergarden explaination, and I really am not so educated in the mechanism of GR, but I thought you might benifit from it)
Now, I hope I have showed you finally how you are wrong, how the Theory of Gravity is wrong, how gravity is not a force, and how gravitation is what we percieve as "gravity (doesnt exist)".