>>16
these people are noobs. zero ring is just some faggot idea made up to explain that OMG a/0 IS POSSIBLE RLY! They keep going off using the wrong math and trying to use that to explain something WAAY over their heads.
>>6 is correct, it's just that idiot
>>8 read it wrong. it's not a "less than/equal to" sign. It should read as set notation like that small looking e. LOL moron.
>>9 0 belongs to the reals and nobody except failed nerds will argue that.