The “tool of terror” is a US law that the US Government passed giving itself the right to attack an international court or country, such as the International Criminal Court in the Hague, if anyone attempts to bring an American official or service member to trial for international crimes. In effect giving themselves complete impunity.
Dr. Herman had this to say about the law: “It was a brazen piece of legislation. I think that was the time they were discussing the International Criminal Court. And in the International Criminal Court it was going to be theoretically possible that the United States’ soldiers and leaders could be brought before the court. And that got some of members of the Congress and Senate very upset”.
“So, they actually got though this incredible piece of legislation that if anybody tried to take one of our soldiers and try him, we would be prepared to invade that country. It was a lunatic piece of legislation and I doubt if it ever would be applied, but it shows the spirit of this country: we are above the law.”
The law in question can only be likened to a situation such as if a maniac-terrorist-bomber-killer-rapist-kidnapper said: “If you come after us we will bomb you”. This is not an exaggeration but in fact an understatement. The law which has had almost no attention internationally, is basically and in all practically, a blackmail letter. An open threat of violence if anyone dares to attempt to hold American criminals to account.
Read more: http://voiceofrussia.com/2013_09_07/Why-the-US-commits-heinous-international-crimes-with-impunity-4897/
Name:
Anonymous2013-11-13 19:55
And we of course supported Iraq when it used chemical warfare against Iran. We even supplied Iraq with various kinds of arms, protected against being attacked in the United Nations, and were attacking our enemy – Iran. So, it was okay. And they were, actually, recently sold I think 600 some million dollars’ worth of cluster bombs to Saudi Arabia. And of course Israel famously used a huge number of cluster bombs in Lebanon in 2006, just before the truce. The cluster bomb is a vicious, essentially illegal weapon.
So, here is the United States doing all these horrible things, including chemical warfare, using white phosphorus in Fallujah, depleted uranium. It has dirty hands. The moral case falls because of this incredible hypocrisy. And the American people don’t go on the offensive - this other part of your question - does it have support at home, and the answer is – in spite of the huge propaganda effort that the Government and the media are carrying out, I think it still only 60% of the polled public is against attacking Syria. The public doesn’t want it. The moral case is badly compromised. So, it is really an outrage.
Read more: http://voiceofrussia.com/2013_09_07/US-use-of-chemical-weapons-extensive-Edward-Herman-9155/
NSA spying and persecuting hackers does not prevent terrorism ...
The Voice of Russia-03/11/2013
So when I just talk with someone like a few days ago that did not even know about NSA truth list and I am surprised like how do you miss this ...
Keep up to date with these results:
Create an email alert for nsa "truth list"
Name:
Anonymous2013-11-13 20:22
Recently
11.13The Cost Of Technology = Freedom, Humanity, Sanity, Health and Life
11.10Government Legislation and Declassified Documents: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly
11.05The Unbearable Lightness of Leaving | Leaving as the Nazis complete their control grid, before its too late
11.05Syria’s Reichstag Moment
11.04Illuminati Mass Mind Control: There’s a Reason It’s Called ‘TV Programming’
11.04David Icke Explains Reptilians and Perception of Reality
10.2511 Articles On EHS | Living With Electro-Hypersensitivity | A Survival Guide
10.25Pregnant women warned of 80pc increased risk of miscarriage from food heated in plastic
10.244 Ways to Detox GMOs from Your Body to Minimize Damaging Effects
10.24Staging the news and staging reality are the same thing
Are you a conservative, a libertarian, a Christian or a gun owner? Are you opposed to abortion, globalism, Communism, illegal immigration, the United Nations or the New World Order? Do you believe in conspiracy theories, do you believe that we are living in the “end times” or do you ever visit alternative news websites (such as this one)? If you answered yes to any of those questions, you are a “potential terrorist” according to official U.S. government documents. At one time, the term “terrorist” was used very narrowly. The government applied that label to people like Osama bin Laden and other Islamic jihadists. But now the Obama administration is removing all references to Islam from terror training materials, and instead the term “terrorist” is being applied to large groups of American citizens. And if you are a “terrorist”, that means that you have no rights and the government can treat you just like it treats the terrorists that are being held at Guantanamo Bay. So if you belong to a group of people that is now being referred to as “potential terrorists”, please don’t take it as a joke. The first step to persecuting any group of people is to demonize them. And right now large groups of peaceful, law-abiding citizens are being ruthlessly demonized.
Name:
Anonymous2013-11-13 20:39
1. Those that talk about “individual liberties”
2. Those that advocate for states’ rights
22. Anyone that is “opposed to the New World Order”
23. Anyone that is engaged in “conspiracy theorizing”
24. Anyone that is opposed to Agenda 21
27. The militia movement
28. The sovereign citizen movement
29. Those that “don’t think they should have to pay taxes”
30. Anyone that “complains about bias”
31. Anyone that “believes in government conspiracies to the point of paranoia”
37. Anyone that “is personally connected with a grievance”
42. Citizens that have “bumper stickers” that are patriotic or anti-U.N.
43. Those that refer to an “Army of God”
44. Those that are “fiercely nationalistic (as opposed to universal and international in orientation)”
45. Those that are “anti-global”
46. Those that are “suspicious of centralized federal authority”
47. Those that are “reverent of individual liberty”
48. Those that “believe in conspiracy theories”
49. Those that have “a belief that one’s personal and/or national ‘way of life’ is under attack”
52. Those that would “insert religion into the political sphere”
53. Anyone that would “seek to politicize religion”
54. Those that have “supported political movements for autonomy”
55. Anyone that is “anti-abortion”
56. Anyone that is “anti-Catholic”
57. Anyone that is “anti-nuclear”
Name:
Anonymous2013-11-13 21:39
Radicalization into Violent Extremism
Tactical Reference Guide - A Guide for Military Leaders
August 2011
OBSERVE Personal Issues
Advocates violence beyond what is “normal”
Exhibits abrupt behavioral shifts
Needs empowerment
Demonizes others freely
FLAG Possible Radicalization
Is sympathetic to radical groups
Visits extremist websites/blogs
Establishes website/blog to display extremist views
Speaks about seeking revenge
Attends rallies for extremist causes
Associates with known radicals
Exhibits extreme religious intolerance
Is personally connected with a grievance
Attempts to recruit others to extremist causes
ACTION Prior to Violent Activity
Suddenly acquires weapons
Organizes protests inspired by extremist ideology
Takes part in criminal activity or has trouble with law enforcement
Advocates violence as a viable option for various situations
Shows a sudden visual shift from radical to “normal “ behavior to conceal radical behavior
Takes suspicious or unreported travel (inside or outside of the
continental United States)
Stores or collects mass weapons or hazardous materials
Verbally indicates hatred for the United States and/or the
Constitution
Exhibits new interests in (Foreign) public or government facilities
Inquires about weapons of mass effects
Yes You NSA
Name:
Anonymous2013-11-13 21:52
52. Those that would “insert religion into the political sphere” // 53. Anyone that would “seek to politicize religion”
religion
rɪˈlɪdʒ(ə)n/
noun
noun: religion
1. the belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, especially a personal God or gods. whatever...
synonyms: faith, belief, divinity, worship, creed, teaching, doctrine, theology; ...
52. Those that would “insert beliefs into the political sphere”
What about your beliefs of ``Terrorism'' ?
Name:
Anonymous2013-11-13 22:37
Australia, for example, is a signatory to Agenda 21 and 88 of its municipalities subscribe to ICLEI, an organization that promotes Agenda 21 globally. Australia's membership is second only to that of the United States.[9] Opposition to Agenda 21 in Australia is not covered in the major media outlets
I've never even heard of it...
Name:
Anonymous2013-11-13 22:45
Wouldn't that mean That ALL Agenda 21 Media Reports are, in fact, in opposition to it?
*Complains of (Censorship) Bias Loudly!* ^^
Name:
Anonymous2013-11-13 22:54
"It is the responsibility of each human being today to choose between the force of darkness and the force of light. We must therefore transform our attitudes, and adopt a renewed respect for the superior laws of Divine Nature."
These globalists present the notion that the world population should not be more than 500 million. That means 93% of the existing population would have to be eliminated. How do you suppose they intend to accomplish that? Or have been accomplishing it?
I suppose the world can only support much less than 500 million ``Super-rich people'' + 499 mil slaves ?
Name:
Anonymous2013-11-14 0:39
POLITICIANS ACT AS AGENTS OF THE UNITED NATIONS TO
ENFORCE AGENDA 21 UPON AUSTRALIANS
Politicians
Show Preference for Covert Undemocratic AG21 Policy
Graham Williamson
Revised
edition
January 2013
This paper is about Agenda 21 and its implementation in Australia.
Its primary purpose is to examine the implementation process and assess its democratic foundations and whether the public have truly been permitted to make an informed democratic choice. Its secondary purpose is to evaluate whether Agenda 21 is beneficial and necessary for Australians. Using extensive documentary evidence from experts, combined with personal
correspondence documented in the Appendices, the following
fundamental facts have been established.
1.
Agenda 21 is a fundamentally undemocratic, sovereignty Threatening, UN designed and monitored program which is being banned overseas because of the threat it poses to fundamental human rights.
Agenda 21 is found to pose a serious risk to freedom and human rights and is unnecessarily foreign in its origin and control.
2.
All three levels of government have been undemocratically implementing this program throughout Australia, on behalf of the UN, for 10-20 years. All the evidence indicates the consistent political refusal to publicly declare AG21 policy
has been non-negotiable & bipartisan.
3.
In 20 years, all major political parties have refused to openly declare their Agenda 21 policy during elections to enable citizens to make an informed democratic choice. All major parties have preferred to implement Agenda 21 as undeclared or covert policy. As a result, community ignorance about AG21 and its implications are widespread.
4.
Although pervasively embedded into government (undeclared) policy at all levels, when directly questioned about AG21 our elected representatives go to extraordinary lengths to either avoid the subject or pretend it is not being implemented.
From all my inquiries, not one politician or bureaucrat eagerly responded by openly detailing the many ways in which the tentacles of AG21 are being implemented through the various government departments.
Implementation of Agenda 21 is based upon a failure to accurately and truthfully inform Australians. It is
based upon deception and trashing of democracy.
Name:
Anonymous2013-11-14 0:58
About 1,880,000 results (0.33 seconds)
UN Prostitution Scandal - Institute for War and Peace Reporting - P230
iwpr.net/report-news/un-prostitution-scandal
Jul 19, 2001 - The United Nations mission in Bosnia-Herzegovina may face an investigation following charges that it sought to cover up media reports ...
Peacekeepers gone wild: How much more abuse will the UN ignore ... www.theglobeandmail.com › News › Politics › Second Reading
Aug 3, 2012 - Rape and exploitation of young Congolese girls at the hands of UN troops is ... that prostitution and sexual abuse followed most UN interventions. ... them remains a scandal that tarnishes the UN's already shaky reputation.
UN shame over sex scandal - World Politics - World - The Independent www.independent.co.uk › News › World › World Politics
Jan 7, 2007 - Investigations last year by the BBC claimed that children had also been subjected to rape and prostitution by UN peacekeepers in Haiti and ...
Name:
Anonymous2013-11-14 1:01
It's Human Nature... so it doesn't really matter which one you are.. you'll make mistakes too
-that's why we have democracy =)
Name:
Anonymous2013-11-14 1:44
a) Intragenerational equity states that common goods such as nature, environment, the ecosystem & therefore private property, must be shared amongst all. No one has exclusive rights of ownership. According to the principle of intragenerational equity, the rights of those who have less may be used to take from those who have more, simply because of this disparity & not because of the existence of any legal debt.
hmm.. you mean like ``Authority'' too?
How many people even vote on 'UN policy'?
Name:
Anonymous2013-11-14 1:47
So why aren't you handing out nuclear weapons..?
I have ``None'' =(
Name:
Anonymous2013-11-14 1:50
No one has exclusive rights of ownership.
Then how can one person have more if no-one has anything?
ftr, Authority is not something You can Steal.
Name:
Anonymous2013-11-14 1:53
Of course you have None, that is what you have chosen.
Name:
Anonymous2013-11-14 2:00
This isn't Schrodinger's cat.... It's a planet with 18 billion eyes and counting..
Name:
Anonymous2013-11-14 2:02
I don't think the cat stays alive if you just kill all the observers....
Name:
Anonymous2013-11-14 2:04
If you haven't seen it lately, it's probably died...
Name:
Anonymous2013-11-14 2:06
Maybe you shouldn't have stuck it in a box with poison..?
Name:
Anonymous2013-11-14 2:26
Section II: Conservation and Management of Resources for Development Includes atmospheric protection, combating deforestation, protecting fragile environments, conservation of biological diversity (biodiversity), control of pollution and the management of biotechnology, and radioactive wastes.
Management of radio-active wastes..?
You're pretty big on nuclear for a `True Greeny' ^^
Name:
Anonymous2013-11-14 2:31
Make the earth glow green, for a greener earth!
Name:
Anonymous2013-11-14 2:35
Someone really should hack the U.N.
I bet the 22nd Agenda is Quite a Read!
Name:
Anonymous2013-11-14 2:37
Cosmic Top Secret.... I'd bet it's quite comical ^^
Name:
Anonymous2013-11-14 2:40
Probably why they restrict access so much...
No-one even has permanent access, or so they say..
Probably doctor the documents to suit each viewer xD
Name:
Anonymous2013-11-14 3:12
[b]terrorism isn't a joke, defining it is!!![b]
Name:
Anonymous2013-11-14 3:13
terrorism isn't a joke, defining it is!! =D
Name:
Anonymous2013-11-14 3:24
My view is such that, if your view conflicts with my view, then You Must Die!!!! let us argue, pls =D
Name:
Anonymous2013-11-14 3:32
No wonder you're so afraid of national security...
Who wouldn't question those types of values..
Shouldn't you be dead by now..? just as a logical application..