>>25
That's completely incorrect, though. Sage simply preserves the equilibrium. Our tangential discussion is not about programming, is not really interesting, and should not be making this thread the first thing a /prog/ browser sees. You cannot deny that, so your posts should not be bumping the thread. If you have an actual insight that goes above and beyond the expectations of this thread, the repositioning of threads serves as a cue to readers.
For all your comments about `new readers,' your constant bumping of threads is not actually helpful to any of them. If a reader cares about fibonacci programs, they will certainly find this thread. If they don't, they won't appreciate this thread constantly jumping up and down in the order as they leisurely read through /prog/. And they certainly won't appreciate it if the posts bumping the thread are unrelated to /prog/ at all, as these threads are.
If you feel it is somehow your responsibility to bump threads that you do not consider shit, you must have a moral obligation to browse through all seven hundred-odd pages of /prog/ and bump the threads you think everyone else should see.