>>2
It's some drama from the ISO C++ Committee news group, where some random dood proposes some changes to the language in a not too polite manner. He brings up some good points, but hurts everyone's feelings.
For example, a choice selection:
BESIDES THE FACT THAT IT'S SO FUCKING RETARDED THAT C++ CAN'T DO **ALL** OF THIS SHIT,
ONE OF THEM,
IN-CLASS-EXPLICIT-SPECIAL,
*WORKS* ON FUCKING MICROSOFT VISUAL STUDIO
FOR A LONG-ASSED TIME NOW.
SO WE HAVE A BUNCH OF FUCKING INCONSISTENT CODE
BECAUSE PEOPLE USE THE SHIT IN VISUAL STUDIO
AND IT DOESN'T GIVE A SINGLE FUCKING WARNING
AND IT DOESN'T WORK ON GCC OR CLANG
CAN YOU GUYS FUCKING VOTE ON IT AND FIX IT?
DUH?
ARE YOU RETARDED?