Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

OS design principles

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-07 9:40

0.OS should be as fast as possible.
1.OS should use the least memory, unless it hurts #0.
2.OS should have the most security, unless it hurts #1,#0.
3.OS should have the most compatibility, unless it hurts #2 , #1,#0.
4.OS should have the most features, unless it hurts #3,#2,#1,#0.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-07 9:50

Operating systems are essentially deprecated, I can already do 99 percent of what I want from within a web-browser.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-07 9:59

>>2
A web browser is just a layer which utilizes OS resources. You're still using an OS.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-07 10:09

>>3
What's your point?

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-07 10:09

NIGGER ARSE

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-07 10:10

Security is more important than speed and memory.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-07 11:35

>>6
Just don't have bank accounts or credit cards and you'll be fine.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-07 14:39

>>7
Says the stalker.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-08 14:04

If you're making an embedded system like Rockbox, your rules are the best. If it's connected to the Internet, security is king. If you can get rooted just by connecting to the Internet, it's crap. If it automatically downloads and runs executable code a la ActiveX in IE 4, it's crap. If every program has raw access to every device as an ordinary user, it's crap. If there's no memory protection (per-process address spaces, segments, a VM, or type tags), it's crap.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-08 17:09

>>9
For embedded systems reliability and predictability become the most important rules. For practical reasons, you often also have to prioritize resource consumption over speed.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-08 18:10

5. OS should allow for the easiest getting of dubs, even if it hurts #3,#2,#1,#0.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-09 0:05

0. OS should be like Unix

Done.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-09 0:20

OS should have the most security, unless it hurts #1,#0.
So basically no encryption at all.

Your design sucks. It would be fast, memory wasting and insecure.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-09 1:06

>>13
So... Windows 98?

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-09 1:29

Fast when? Least memory where?  You can't just say ``hurr durr, design choice is optimize speed'' - there are tradeoffs you need to take into account.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-09 1:30

>>14
No, Windows ME.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-09 1:39

>>2
What I want to do is different from you, so bleh.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-09 1:41

OS should let you customize stuff and not shove bullshit gimmick crap down your throat.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-09 1:51

1. Stability
2. Simplicity
3. Security

Everything should be standardised.
There should be alternatives to everything.
Everything should be file.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-09 4:55

0. Security
1. Security
2. Security
3. Security
4. Security

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-09 5:35

It should be written in C.
It should use lightweight C library like musl.
Everything should be statically linked.
The tools should work efficiently together.
The base system should be minimal.
The file system hierarchy should be simple and minimal.
It should be combine the best features of BSD and GNU/Linux.
It should have package management and trusted software repositories.
It should use rolling-release.
Everything should be well documented.
It should have good hardware support.
It should have good APIs to attract developers.
At first it would be good to have emulation for dynamically linked binaries, linux binaries, linux proc filesystem etc..

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-09 5:36

lel I'm such a nerd I start my lists at index 0. *giggles*

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-09 5:46

OpenBSD?

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-09 15:17

>>23
0. Must be developed by an absolute cunt.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-10 9:56

Btw is there any good competitors to POSIX?

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-10 11:05

>>25
Inferno OS

Name: Interix 2013-08-10 11:10

>>25
Let's:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/POSIX
Let's scroll to the bottom and look at the "See also" section, which may have relevant nformation on the article that I am reading.
TRON project – alternative OS standard to POSIX
why oh my, there are such things

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-10 11:16

>>25
Windows NT

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List