FaggotCase vs lowercase_underscores

If you aren't using lowercase_underscores (or lowercase-hyphens for you schemers) you're doing it completely wrong. PascalCase/camelCase aka JewCase identifiers take between 0.5-1.0 seconds longer to visually parse and identify.

http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5521745&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5521745
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5970159&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5970159
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=5970176&navigation=1
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=6240505&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D6240505
http://whathecode.wordpress.com/2013/02/16/camelcase-vs-underscores-revisited/
https://whathecode.wordpress.com/2011/02/10/camelcase-vs-underscores-scientific-showdown/

but TL;DR
lowercase_underscores : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_jXKIy_2p5U
NiggerCase : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0itOCgJtNVU

Results indicate that camel casing leads to higher accuracy among all subjects regardless of training, and those trained in camel casing are able to recognize identifiers in the camel case style faster than identifiers in the underscore style.
Results

    Camel casing has a larger probability of correctness than underscores. (odds are 51.5% higher)
    On average, camel case took 0.42 seconds longer, which is 13.5% longer.
    Training has no statistically significant impact on how style influences correctness.
    Those with more training were quicker on identifiers in the camel case style.
    Training in one style, negatively impacts the find time for other styles.

 Conclusion:CamelCase is superior is all aspects.