Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

[Challenge] Rewrite ANDRU [trivial]

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-08 21:49

Help Mentifex solve the AI problem: rewrite ANDRU in your language of choice.

ANDRU is a chatbot, it should wait for the user to enter a string and reply with an English sentence. It doesn't need to make too much sense but should output grammatically valid sentences.

Your ANDRU should not need to be trained nor should he learn its vocabulary with user input (no Markov Chain).

You are allowed, on the other hand to scrape any data from Internet (website, forum, file, twitter, IRC ...). You may not use computer-generated data (don't pipe another chatbot).

Keep it short (10-20 LoC)

Bonus points for passing the Turing test with an average retard. Deadline: 24h.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-08 22:02

I found the Journal difficult with which to work and lacking in an appreciation for feminist jurisprudence and critical race theory. I utilized”womyn”and”humyn”in my writing in approximately 5-7 places in a 50-page manuscript, citing my previous article, which explains my use of this spelling convention. I wasn’t forcing anyone to accept my views, but I did expect as a scholar, and as an individual with subjective worth, for my philosophical persuasions to be taken seriously.

My alternate spelling was flatly refused. I don’t dispute that it’s not standard spelling. I’m pretty sure that’s obvious to us all. The Journal was unwilling to bend in the least. Instead of asking me to explain why my position was valid, I was asked to explain why the journal uses standard spelling, making the Editorial Board’s misguided case for them. I was willing to work with the Editorial Board to replace”womyn and men”with”society”or”persons.” I knew comprise could happen, so I retorted by making the edits.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List