I think what Snowden did is wrong. He betrayed his Nation.
Name:
Anonymous2013-07-01 10:31
>>79 Fine. Then everyone (except those who don't use technology) was hurt because their privacy was invaded. If you don't understand why that is, then please read Schneier's essays because I'm tired of repeating. Also https://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1315415275/45,49
>>78
Someone needs to program the machine. As >>80 said, since reality is quite complex and nuanced, so would the program have to be. But then it's easy to hide something in a complex program.
Name:
Anonymous2013-07-01 11:02
>>81
Yep, so if this twat Snowden kept his mouth shut, nobody would be butthurt because they wouldn't know their privacy was being invaded.
Ignorance is bliss.
Name:
Anonymous2013-07-01 11:04
>>82
so it's okay to do bad things to people as long as they don't realize it? you are fit to be a politician.
>>83
See >>84. You're taking it out of proportion. The act of mass surveillance isn't bad per se. Whether they're doing anything bad with that information isn't clear.
>>82,84
Lel-kun, I know the board has been kind of slow and there haven't been any good lels recently, but that's no reason to resort to such poor trolling. I know you can do much better than that.
Name:
Anonymous2013-07-01 11:12
>>81
It was not openly known, but, as programmers, we KNEW such thing existed, because we know something like this could be built. Am i right?
Name:
Anonymous2013-07-01 11:15
Let's use ANDRU so he befriends PRISM. Then we can use ANDRU to use PRISM to our purposes (access Nikita's webcam and get nude pics of Cudder)
>>88
now it all makes sense. nikita is a girl name. nikita grew up in a heterocissexist and antisemitic environment and now hates herself for what she is, jewish and transsexual. she separates herself from her feminine alter-ego, and externalizes her hatred.
>>85 The act of mass surveillance isn't bad per se.
The mere existence of the infrastructure makes it possible for it to be abused. Also why would I trust the USA government with my private information?
Name:
Anonymous2013-07-01 12:00
>>92
You volunteered it to companies who in turn volunteered it to them.
>>96
ToS didn't mention anything about warrantless spying.
Name:
Anonymous2013-07-01 12:14
>>97
It discusses who owns the information the service generates, what they can do with it and how little expectation of privacy there is.
Name:
Anonymous2013-07-01 12:28
NSA hasn't checked these dubs!!!!
Name:
Anonymous2013-07-01 17:04
>>98
I don't see why dumb people who can't read the ToS should be punished by losing their right to privacy. If anything, this is ableist and is against human rights.
Name:
Anonymous2013-07-01 17:12
>>100
cretinous win cretin
>mfw le cretin is cretinous
JE VAIS ENCULEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEL
Name:
Anonymous2013-07-01 17:14
>>101
That is francophobic. Cease such behaviour immediately and apologize!