To you lisp lovers

What has lisp ever done for reducing the memory footprint of a computer program? The answer is nothing, nothing at all. This is all the work of C.

>>88
C/C++ still requires MMU for its speed. Had such MMU be provided say for Common Lisp, it would have been a lot faster than C/C++ due to microkernel design and array bound checking in hardware.

>>92
For example, http://www.cs.ucr.edu/~gupta/teaching/260-08/Papers/TR181.pdf

and C/C++ still have to do array-bound-checking, else you get unreliable code.