Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Computer science movie

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-21 14:59

http://youtu.be/yMSsf9szC2o

They're releasing a movie about the greatest computer scientist of our time.

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-22 16:42

`
>iphone
>an important innovation
>basic
>an important innovation
>this is what /g/tards (who don't know what LISP or Motorola are), actually believe
>mfw
>lel

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-22 16:43

>>41

le lel mfw groski.

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-22 20:45

>>38
You’re just admitting that you are a idiotic mongoloid.

Shove your friendliness up your ass, kid.

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-22 20:48

>>36
Fuck off you stupid technophile, Dijkstra’s work made your shitty accessible computing technically possible. Fuck modern culture, any decent human being has no respect for it and nor do they want to impact it in a way that would continue its existence.

>>25
Real programming isn't ``coding''.

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-22 20:55

>>43
Go scrubprove another toilet you impractical academic.

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-22 20:58

>>45
s/toilet/theorem

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-22 21:19

>>44
Lel, so edgy!

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-22 21:22

>>47
Please do not abuse the sage functionality .

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-22 21:29

I actually thought /prog/ was going to be more of the unix and academic type but nope. Really is filled with idiot worker type of programmer. Imbeciles, back to /g/ I suppose.

Also, I shit on steve job's grave :).

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-22 22:43

PROGTIP: OS X IS UNIX®

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-22 22:49

>>49
/prog/ is inherently a Lisp board with antisemitic twists, and you expected ``unix''?

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-22 23:34

>>51
/prog/ is inherently an antisemitism board with LISP twists, and you expected ``/prog/''?

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-23 1:19

>>52
Lisp is inherently a semitic language with /prog/ twists, and you expected ``antisemitism''?

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-23 2:09

lisp is shit, i prefer haskell for the kind of programming one would do with lisp, unix and c forever, i'd rather use windows than os x

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-23 2:10

also bill gates is much more charismatic to me than steve jobs

jobs is juts like some sort of used car salesman, nothing respectable therre

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-23 7:28

>>4
AGREED

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-23 7:33

>>55
le /g/entoo face xD

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-23 8:09

>>54
HALP! I'm trying to translate (if t (lambda (x) x) (lambda (x) (first x))) into Haskell, but GHC gives me the following error:
Prelude> (if True then (\x -> x) else (\x -> fst x))

<interactive>:1:36:
    Occurs check: cannot construct the infinite type: a = (a, b)
      Expected type: (a, b)
      Inferred type: a
    In the expression: fst x
    In the expression: (\ x -> fst x)

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-23 8:10

>>55
Bill Gates is 1/2 Jewish. He father looks very ashkenazi.

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-23 8:15

>>58
You should stop being such a fucking retoid and read the error message.

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-23 8:20

what is true..? ^^

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-23 9:38

>>60
Error message is meaningless.

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-23 9:43

>>62
as is the input?

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-23 9:59

>>59
Even the kikes would cast him out, he is not halakha. Khazar ethnocentrism extends so far as to consider children like Bill Gates as mutant abominations, not having an actual soul ``blessed by hashem''. The crazy kike kunt in that video laid that out perfectly plainly, if you'll remember.

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-23 12:54

>>64
Even the kikes would cast him out, he is not halakha.
Not an axiom. For example, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arkady_and_Boris_Strugatsky considered themselves Jewish, despite only their father was Jewish.

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-23 12:58

>>63
Input (if t (lambda (x) x) (lambda (x) (first x))) works

Name: Thread Shitter 2013-06-23 14:42

I'm taking a shit into your thread -- huuuuuh pffarplfshhhhh farP! splash

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-23 16:20

>>66
What is the type of the result?

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-23 16:27

>>68
It's a function with one argument.

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-23 16:29

>>58
Here you go: x

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-23 16:33

>>68
what is the type?

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-23 16:34

>>71
abstract casuistry, Jews invented to fool goyim.

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-23 16:50

>>68
type f : a -> a where a = (a,b)

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-23 17:41

Computer Science movie: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Op3QLzMgSY

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-23 17:54

>>74
In my dictionary, the preferred definition of science involves discovering properties of the natural world. Engineering involves the application of those properties to solve practical problems. By those definitions programmers are neither scientists nor engineers. The principal objects of their study are manmade, not natural. -- William A. Wulf, Professor of Engineering and Applied Sciences

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-23 17:57

>>75
Computer science is not about Science and it's not about computers. -- Hal Ableson

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-23 18:00

Since the film Hackers, I don't believe in an accurate technological movie from Moneywood.

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-23 18:09

>>77
Matrix was accurate.

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-23 18:11

>>77
Office Space was accurate.

Name: Anonymous 2013-06-23 18:13

>>78
>ping
>nmap
Probably the only commands used trough the whole series
Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -