YOU FUCKING SAID YOUR YID LOVING KIKESUCKING SCUMBAG NKVD PRESIDENT WAsNT A YID LOVING KIKESUCKER?
>Russia has cancelled the deal to sell S-300 missiles to Syria, a senior Russian official tells the British Sunday Times.
>The official explained the cancellation was a result of Russia’s concern that the missiles could fall into the wrong hands and be used to attack civilian aircraft at the Ben Gurion airport.
>“We are very much concerned about this; the large Russian community in Israel is a major factor in our attitude to Israel, and we will not let this happen,” the official told The Sunday Times.
>He said that an agreement to cancel the deal with Syria was reached during the recent meeting in Russia between Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and President Vladimir Putin. In return for cancelling the deal, the official added, Russia expects Israel to refrain from further air strikes in Syria.
>>1 YOU FUCKING SAID YOUR YID LOVING KIKESUCKING SCUMBAG NKVD PRESIDENT WAsNT A YID LOVING KIKESUCKER?
I never said that. Especially because Putin got his position due to Putin's own Jewish ancestry, Jewish oligarchs and Putin's former patron https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anatoly_Sobchak who is Jewish by Halakha.
Name:
Anonymous2013-05-26 3:03
>>3
So you're saying that wasn't you over in /newpol/?
Name:
Anonymous2013-05-26 3:07
>>1
Then again, it would be better if Syrian relatively secular regime get toppled and replaced with hardcore jihadist movement, capable of butchering kikes and christfags.
is that a typo? the large Russian community in Israel is a major factor in our attitude to Israel,
the large Israeli community in Russia is a major factor in our attitude to Israel?
Name:
Anonymous2013-05-26 3:17
>>7
Likely. Because there are no Russians in Israel - only russian speaking Jews, which speak russian with heavy accent.
Name:
Anonymous2013-05-26 3:19
Hi
I just want you to notice that this cyber-conversation is not programming related. Now you have the alternative to go program a little, or taking your (rather uninteresting) discussion where it matters.
...in this day and age, does anyone really care what someone in another country thinks..? i think you'll find it's sadly a much smaller percentage than you think...
>>13
This is horrible! and did he have to fill her up like some water balloon! This is disturbing! Honestly I am sure she can find a mate herself and do this without a human to rape her with machines! Honestly, why even come up with something like this! I don't even want to know what was done to get that sperm!
when I buy a automatic gun and start killing as many people as I can without having any regret and even feel good seeing all of them bleeding. *grin*
Just thinking about it makes me smile :)
Name:
Anonymous2013-05-26 5:00
>>14'
>actually clicking any of that kike's links
>letting him profile you through jewgle
>thinking you're not gonna have mossad at your door soon
>>16
LLLLLLLLEEEEEEEEEEELLLLLLL E/G/IN POST /G/RO XDDDDDDDDDDDDD
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-31 7:45
Cantor applied his concept of one-to-one correspondence to infinite sets;[1] e.g. the set of natural numbers N = {0, 1, 2, 3, ...}. Thus, all sets having a one-to-one correspondence with N he called denumerable (countably infinite) sets and they all have the same cardinal number. This cardinal number is called ℵ0, aleph-null. He called the cardinal numbers of these infinite sets, transfinite cardinal numbers.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-31 8:30
Assuming the axiom of choice and, given an infinite cardinal κ and a finite cardinal μ greater than 0, the cardinal ν satisfying νμ = κ will be κ.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-31 9:15
Sometimes infinite result of a physical quantity may mean that the theory being used to compute the result may be approaching the point where it fails. This may help to indicate the limitations of a theory.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-31 10:01
Sets alone. This includes the most common axiomatic set theory, Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory (ZFC), which includes the axiom of choice. Fragments of ZFC include:
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-31 10:46
The paradoxes of naive set theory can be explained in terms of the inconsistent assumption that "all classes are sets". With a rigorous foundation, these paradoxes instead suggest proofs that certain classes are proper.