Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Why not just simulate quantum computers?

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-12 18:16

Quantum computers run on quantum mechanics, which can be modeled off on a quantum computer? All the benefits and none of the drawbacks. Tomorrow's technology, today!

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-12 18:19

Run a virtual QC on a QC? Sure, why?

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-12 18:28

Multiple processor machines can be simulated on i386 machines.  All of the benefits and none of the drawbacks.

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-12 18:36

Futanari can be stimulated on my penor. All of the benefits and none of the drawbacks.

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-12 18:36

>>3
hyperthreading a shit

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-12 18:38

Exponential slowdown ... blah.

Name: Master !WIZardrY9E 2013-05-12 18:47

Because quantum entanglement can not been reliably performed yet, and current technology only allows a few qubits to become entangled, not enough to perform at the theoretical speed that it could. However quantum tunelling has been proved, I remember reading in an article a while back, a CPU chip that successfully implemented it, but QT is no way near as fast for transmission as entanglement.

I have doubts about quantum entanglement though. Thing is these particles are extremely sensitive, even small changes in the relative environment can offset its state, hence produce erroneous results. On top of this I hate reading all these FTL transmission BS. No information travels in quantum entanglement, it's such BS. It's simply entangled particles (i.e. parent photons being split into two daughter photons), and the daughter photons simply inherit the properties of the parent photon. Hence when the state is analysed of course both daughter photons will produce same result, theoretically these daughter photons can be galaxies apart, but as stated previously they are highly sensitive to surrounding conditions. Thus the state will easily be changed, and the ``entanglement'; broken no longer producing the symmetrical results.

Why I even bothered to post that here instead of /sci/, maybe you will learn something.

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-12 18:50

>>7
Why I even bothered to post that here instead of /sci/, maybe you will learn something.
maybe you will learn something.
Heheheh, sure we will.

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-12 18:54

>>8
huehuehuehue XD

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-12 18:57

>>9
lel, /gro/bro!

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-12 19:33

>>8
Oh, we'll learn something, not programming, but something.

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-12 19:47

>>11
Most definitely not physiks, maybe something like manga names

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-12 19:58

Do danmaku bullets obey classical physics?

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-12 20:10

b

Name: Master !WIZardrY9E 2013-05-12 22:31

>>12
What the fuck am I reading on Google about these bullets.

However the Wiki states, I quote "The patterns themselves can be intricate and complex, giving the barrage a beautiful, if deadly, nature." and "In addition, the majority of enemy bullets are sprayed wildly and have no chance of actually hitting the player."

Thus I come to the conclusion they do obey classical physics. Firstly at the quantum level, sub-atomic particles have less probability working as a system, hence no intricate patterns. Secondly invoking quantum properties would give rise to the probability of spontaneous emission, causing these bullets to randomly appear on the screen, hence a 99.99999% kill rate. Which of course does not seem to be the case in any game.

Case solved.

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-12 22:51

>>15
But then how do you explain the fact that they don't hurt the 2hu's body, but her soul? As Penrose proved that the soul\mind of a person is directly linked to quantum tunneling in the brain, so how could danmaku not be quantum in nature?

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-12 23:08

>>16
I can smash your quantum CPU with a classical sledgehammer.

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-13 1:16

You can simulate a quantum computer with a classical digital computer. It just requires exponentially more resources.

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-13 4:45

>>16
Penrose is full of shit and people literally wipe shit all over his life's work (it's printed on toilet paper).

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-13 7:39

UVB-76, UVB-76, 93, 882, NAIMINA, 74, 14, 35, 74, 9, 3, 8, 8, 2, Nikolai, Anna, Ivan, Mikhail, Ivan, Nikolai, Anna, 7, 4, 1, 4, 3, 5, 7, 4.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List