Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Perl: Jewel in the Rough or Scourge of IT?

Name: Anonymous 2013-04-24 11:29

Name: Anonymous 2013-04-24 20:33

>>10
This is one of the worst versions of these. The Python one was good. The PHP one was good, but this one reeks of desperation and the reasoning behind a lot of what you call shitty are obvious.
Also
Perl doesn't require variables to be declared
Every perl programmer worth anything uses strict. Perl is one of the only scripting langauges to get lexical scoping correct.

Name: Anonymous 2013-04-24 21:03

>>12
Every perl programmer worth anything uses strict.
One language designer "fixed" his language by forking it. No he has two problems.

Perl is one of the only scripting langauges to get lexical scoping correct.
No it doesn't, because strict isn't default. It is like saying C/C++ does memory management right, because you can throw in reference counting through __attribute__((cleanup (scoped))).

Name: Anonymous 2013-04-24 21:56

No it doesn't, because strict isn't default.
This is a bad argument. The reason strict isn't on by default is because a lot of programmers like to use perl for quick one or two line scripts from their terminal itself. Of course, for actual Perl programs, strict is there for everyone to use.

Perl gives us the tools, just because people don't use them correctly doesn't mean it's a bad language.

Name: Anonymous 2013-04-24 22:37

>>17
The reason strict isn't on by default is because a lot of programmers like to use perl for quick one or two line scripts from their terminal itself.
Such programmers should pick APL or J - they look as ugly, but don't waste space on sigils.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List