elitists and depth

I typed elitists with a small "e" to emphasize that I am an anti-elitist. Why can't elitists recognize the irony in the statement "You aren't succeeding in sounding deep."? Depth doesn't sound deep; depth is deep. Depth isn't superficial, at least not suprasubjectively superficial, but pseudo-objective elitists will never understand how depth can be pervasively superficial. Fuck /a/, fuck /prog/, fuck 4chan, fuck elitists and anti-elitists all the same. While I realize that I may change, at least I am that change, while you are nothing but a bunch of cold, hard, judgmental, illogically logical non-changing facts. (Truly the pinnacle of objectivity. If those kinds of people are the people who define the law, I'm ready to be a criminal.)

If you want me to entertain you, be your personal clown, you should at least emit a reaction (and by reaction, I don't mean the usual "how edgy" stock response). "You're doing fine on your own", you may say. "We're your reality, but you're living a dream", you may sarcastically blurt out. What I say is that while reality and objectivity may be sandwiching us together at a more-or-less steadily accelerating/decelerating rate (of change), there is a purpose for consciousness. Yes, I said consciousness, what are you going to do, call me stupid? Joke's on you, not only am I already aware of that fact, but the apparent lack of intellect is reciprocal and always was, even before you or I were aware that levels of intellect could be distinct outside the self, outside perception.

Let us return to a natural state.

>>23
You're just a coward. A coward and a faggot. I haven't seen a faggot of such historic proportions since ancient times when Snacks roamed the web. Death is too good for you. I'm glad you'll be forced by your own cowardice to suffer your loathsome little existence. It's just a shame that everyone else will be forced to suffer you as well.