Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Lispcoin

Name: Anonymous 2013-04-09 2:15

What's Lispcoin? A cryptographically-secure monetary system written in ANSI Common Lisp.
Features:
*Written in 100% pure ANSI Common Lisp.
*Promotes innovation by giving bonuses to users of Free software and non-x86 hardware.
*Reward doesn't shrink so early adopters can't become millionaires for doing nothing.
*GPU-proof, ASIC-proof, quantum-proof algorithm to keep calculations secure into the future.
If it ain't Lispcoin, it's crap!

Name: Anonymous 2013-04-09 2:51

What's the algorithm?

Name: Anonymous 2013-04-09 2:59

>>2
(defn fibs (n)
  (if (< n 2)
    n
    (+ (fibs (- n 1)) (fibs (- n 2)))))

Name: Anonymous 2013-04-09 3:00

So instead of an exponentially-expanding money supply or a geometrically-expanding one, you've chosen to split the difference and go with a linear one?

Name: Anonymous 2013-04-09 3:00

defn

fuck of with your nu lisp look at me im a famous programming  language inventor shit

Name: Anonymous 2013-04-09 3:06

>>5
Sorry, I don't know the diff between Common Lisp and Closure. ((scheme)) is the ultimate language.

Name: Anonymous 2013-04-09 3:06

>>3
You've got be sold. I'll starting mining now

Name: >>6 2013-04-09 3:07

Though I do prefer defmacro to syntax-*, hygiene be damned.

Name: Anonymous 2013-04-09 4:01

>>8
Hygiene is a good thing though. In lisp, all macros generate code that could otherwise be written by hand. With scheme it is possible to get other sorts of bindings not possible with hand written code. Although you can do just as well with lisp using packages to refer to your ``hidden'' symbols. But I am on the fence. I would like to see a less complicated scheme-like macro system that both gives hygiene and allows arbitrary scheme code generating code, but maybe it's there and I just need to learn more about it.

Name: Anonymous 2013-04-09 4:30

>>9
define-syntax/syntax-rules is as simple as possible, it's literally the best macro system in the universe.

Name: Anonymous 2013-04-09 5:02

>>10
syntax-rules is shit. It's a step towards the c preprocessor. It's taking the only thing that makes lisp uniquely good and throwing it in the trash.

Name: Anonymous 2013-04-09 5:25

>>11
you clearly have no idea what you're talking about

Name: Anonymous 2013-04-09 6:22

look at these fukkin nerds

Name: Anonymous 2013-04-09 8:16

>>13
Fuck you, ``fagstorm''! lel

Name: Anonymous 2013-04-09 20:57

>>12 NO U DONT UNDRSTAN HOMO ICONIC PRO GRAM ING. GET OUT.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List