Ruby 2.0 is faster than Python

How did that happen?

>>40
Fuck you illogical cretin I HATE YOU DIE IN A FIRE AGFDGSFD GHSFDGSDFGDFBSDBSDVB DS I HATE YOU DIIEE DIE DIE

>>41                           `
>rage line noise
>no GJS
ISHYGDDT

>>40
Those statements are as obvious as they are irrelevant. Everyone knows that, you are the one saying that as an excuse to be an asshole, like a middle schooler would. There's much more to human and social interaction than what's within the bounds of the law.

/poe blocks a plate/

>>43
Everyone knows that, you are the one saying that as an excuse to be an asshole, like a middle schooler would.
I can imagine you typing that with that smug smirk on your clean shaven face, thinking you're so much better than everyone else. Fuck you.

Those statements are as obvious as they are irrelevant. (...) There's much more to human and social interaction than what's within the bounds of the law.
Fine, now that the obvious is out of the way, we can now talk about social protocol and the finer points of social environments and contexts. Could you please explain to me how the fuck someone could possibly arrive to the conclusion that /prog/ is anywhere close to an emotionally-safe environment? I mean sure, it's missing a big trigger warning page in 72pt big red letters, but it should otherwise be obvious to anyone with half a brain.

>>44
Fine, now that the obvious is out of the way, we can now talk about social protocol and the finer points of social environments and contexts. Could you please explain to me how the fuck someone could possibly arrive to the conclusion that /prog/ is anywhere close to an emotionally-safe environment?
There's quite a gap between what you think of /prog/, what I think of /prog/, and an emotionally safe environment.

No, this, isn't some tea club for elderly ladies, but that doesn't mean that everyone being a fuckwad with a raging rage-boner all day is a fine state for a forum to be.

I enjoy trolling and shitpostery as much as any guy here, but gratuitous bile being spit all-over, all the time, isn't that much entertaining after you see that you start predisposing yourself to see gratuitous bile being spit all-over, all the time. You can do that, you are within your right, but covering it saying that it's a free Internet is a cop-out. You could at least say that it's for le lulz, but then you'd have to face that it's unfunny as fuck after you see the 100000th guy pulling the same tired shit, again, for the millionth time.

>>45
that doesn't mean that everyone being a fuckwad with a raging rage-boner all day is a fine state for a forum to be.
I agree, it gets quite tiresome after a while.

I enjoy trolling and shitpostery as much as any guy here, but gratuitous bile being spit all-over, all the time, isn't that much entertaining after you see that you start predisposing yourself to see gratuitous bile being spit all-over, all the time.
Once again, I agree. It gets boring, and gratuitous bile no longer has any value (from a humour point of view) if abundant.

You can do that, you are within your right, but covering it saying that it's a free Internet is a cop-out. You could at least say that it's for le lulz, but then you'd have to face that it's unfunny as fuck after you see the 100000th guy pulling the same tired shit, again, for the millionth time.
I'm not exactly sure what you're talking about. Are you referring to my textual anger at your (et al.) previous posts (as in >>33,35,37,40,44), or are you implying that I am responsible for other gratuitously bileful shitposts?

>>46
I'm not exactly sure what you're talking about. Are you referring to my textual anger at your (et al.) previous posts (as in >>33,35,37,40,44), or are you implying that I am responsible for other gratuitously bileful shitposts?

Well, addressing people on sentiments here on /prog/ is a pretty abstract and bullshitty business, given our anonymity. You were arguing with, at least, two different people there.

Anyway, there's something to be said about le edgey racist posts; they are clearly a cheap, if not very effective, way to troll people, as they only get annoying if spammed continuously. The initial onslaught of Nikita was resisted for quite a few days, before we started to crack and respond to him, for instance. As being a form of trolling, they hold a certain value, though I'm not fond of them, as they only provoke because they're tiresome, and they make the forum annoying to read as well.

>>47
Oh, well then, we actually agree. Have a good day, sir.

>>15
If you want to implement an OS, you can look at how it is currently done in ASM, C, and in some cases SEEPLES. An OS isn't that different from any other sort of application. If you want security, just don't use eval. Restrict the capability of the interface to the permissions allowed to the user. The big difference though is if you mess up, you might ruin your hard drive. But that's what simulators are for. Check out QEMU.

You could implement an OS in Common LISP or even Symta, as long as you could write the needed assembly and embed it in your code. And the compiled code will need to run as a kernel process, rather than application process. IE, it doesn't ask for memory using a system call, it just goes at gets it, because it's the kernel.

I found some VIP quality code in /etc/init.d/onioncat
   RETVAL="$?"
   [ "$RETVAL" = 2 ] && return 2
   return "$RETVAL"