Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Ruby 2.0 is faster than Python

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-26 22:13

How did that happen?

Name: Anonymous 2013-03-27 3:03

I am quite happy about that. Python is completely broken. Python3000 sounds like a joke product. Ruby at least is real OOP and has anonymous functions, closures and various functional constructs. The core library is not broken. While the python community is still striving to produce a normal HTTP client, which doesn't "function" like urllib1-1000.0. And for some reason the python community keeps producing the same shit over and over again like autistic retards with a severe case of ocd. The python community is also extremely sexist and misogyny is no stranger to them.

I never use Ruby or Python. I like racket, which is like 38 times faster than either of them. I like haskell, which is 50 times faster. I also like C, which is like 258 times faster. I don't understand why people would chose a crippled language with badly implemented high level features, which is also slow and dare to advertise itself as a HLL. Constricted by mediocrity, that is how it feels to be constricted by python. In C I can create any object system I need. I would chose Ruby over python every day. Even if it is 2 times slower. It wouldn't matter from my perspective. It is just slow.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List