How was your day today, /prog/?
Mine wasn't particularly productive at all.
I should've been coding a Java linked-list project or writing up specs for another project.
But instead I spent time on the internet finding pictures of Rumia.
Such is life.
Name:
Anonymous2013-03-28 9:54
>>43
Khrushchev was a fucking commie and there was no good people among commies. Even if Khrushchev was described as "anti-Semite", that is because secular commie Jews banned religious Zionist Jews.
I love openly Zionist Jews, like silly Ayn Rand, because Zionists frame Jewry as being racist, opening themselves for our strike, while commie Jews cover their racism with "egalitarian" nonsense.
Name:
Anonymous2013-03-28 9:57
So, kids, remember: Zionist Jew is 1000x times better than a commie Jew or a christian Jew, who manages to recruit goyim to defend Jewish cause. Nazi Germany wasn't defeated by Zionist Jews, but by commie Jews (Soviets) and christian Jews (Americunts).
Name:
Anonymous2013-03-28 10:16
Zionism, the search for utopia. What about Christian Zionists? Those think the creation of Israel was significant for their believe. Do these also need to be cleansed?
Name:
Anonymous2013-03-28 10:21
>>48 What about Christian Zionists?
Typical fat American genetic garbage.
Name:
Anonymous2013-03-28 10:32
I don't like religious people at all.
A little joke to lighten up a bit:
What do all Jews, Christians and Muslims have in common? They all bleed if you stab them.
I wanted to create an implicit this in the methods of an object system I am building in scheme. I do this by transforming the lambda with a macro. But it doesn't seem to work. I understand this is because the macro is hygienic. It will get relabel all variable so no collision happens. How can I overcome this? Is there a way to force a macro unhygienic?