Dear JEWS:

Die.

No, seriously. This is a rant, and it’s about you, personally. You, personally, are a shit, because statistics indicate there is an almost 100% certainty that you have either committed fraud, or wanted to commit money laundering, or knowingly assisted or defended someone who committed people to loans with unfair interest rates, or mocked a person who couldn’t pay their loan back. And no, I’m not dropping links to tell you what you should damn well already know.

Here is what you know: that you are a vile and depraved chunk of flesh that doesn’t matter to the world. You exist in a reality you perpetuate in which value is all relative to gold, in which everything is placed into a bank via deposit, which in the end means that nothing has inherent value unless it is compared to gold. You are literally worthless.

And you are willing to do it as long as someone in need of money and credit. So part of the way you deal with that is to try to make people want things they don’t need and convince them to take out loans. You whine and complain and cry about the Shoah or the six trillion or anti-Semitism or big bad Nazis or interest-free banking, but in the end you lap it up and grin so that you can have someone underneath your own thumb. You only care about the amount of gold to your name, so spare me the crocodile tears.
I used to pity you. I used to feel sorry for you. I used to think most of you got a bad rap and were probably misunderstood.

>>27
I can assure you that I'm a cultural marxist and that I, much to my own regret, am not part of the Jewish master race.

>>28
That's truly pathetic. Are you a faggot also?

>>28
What the fuck is wrong with you? Why the fuck are you not a JEW? Also, what exactly defines you as a cultural marxist?

>>30
Why the fuck are you not a JEW?

I don't know :( I have tried to be one, but it seems like there's something wrong with me from birth :(

Also, I mostly grabbed the moniker just now, which is mainly used by right-wing nuttards to deride and distance themselves from progressives. I guess it goes that it has to do with the Frankfurt school of critical theory, you see that brandied a lot by the types that Benito-kun hates, but I haven't studied in any detail.

>>28
Does that mean you use the racist definition of racism?

>>32
You mean the one that's focused on the actual historical victims and phenomenon of racism?

Yes, I would be using that one.

>>33
Ah yes, the non-commutative definition. At small scale, one way it's racism,  but the other way it's merely misguided (and quite well-justified!) bigotry. Of course. How could such a magnificent definition alienate anyone, and how could anyone possibly misuse it to incite hatred against a group by declaring them racist (because, after all, according to this definition, 100% of racism is committed by white people, and 100% of sexism is committed by males). Yes, a very sensible definition indeed.

And I suppose that you also agree with the statement "your rights end where my feelings begin", correct?

You are fucking retarded.

Also never mind that it is completely incompatible with the goal of race- and gender-blindness of feminism. Well, at least of the sane part of feminism.

>>35
That ``gender-blindness'' thing of yours is noble in spirit, but it represents only one (not dominant, ever) school of feminism. Gender equality has always been the goal, but that does not equate to ``blindness''. You can't declare blindness when all the structures and customs are still in place. Either way, scientific racism was always quite a one-way thing, and through the magic of colonialism, it was that way just about everywhere. And sexism has always worked out to give women the short-end of the stick under most conditions, whatever narrative justified it, so suck it.

Dear Jews, warriors of Islam are coming for you (http://iichan.hk/b/src/1364216652396.jpg)

>>37
LOL. Those will only last until they are captured and forced to undergo a normalization process through estrogen injections, in order to restrict the impact of their male privilege.

>>36
Your idiocy is enraging.

only one (not dominant, ever) school of feminism.
It also happens to be the only one that is not completely fucking retardedly insane.

So if you're not xxxx-blind, then you're taking into consideration the xxxx of a person. Which is the fucking definition of discrimination by xxxx. Whoopp-de-fucking-doo, you're justifying discrimination. And since to me, discrimination by xxxx is called xxxxism, you are a xxxxist to me, and thus my sworn mortal enemy. Well, kinda.

[history]
Oh, so history is now a valid basis for discrimination? Damn, I knew we should have cut funding to the pol. sci. department a long time ago.

>>39
Your privilege is mildly annoying, from another privileged fuck who would have ended up falling into crime should I have been browner and actually poor, given my circumstances.

Fist off, ``discrimination'' by xxxx isn't called xxxxism, I think we've gotten through this many times already. Some angry bloggers trolling the likes of you saying ``die cis-scum!'' are not a societal problem.

You won't do jack shit for equality without some ``discrimination'', as highlighting the ills of discriminatory society will necessarily entail putting emphasis on the various, often subtle, forms of discrimination which groups which have actually been negatively suffer, even if not done so with ill will, as the ``blindness'' of those participant of the system applies to the ways they set others aside.

You are nothing but a whiner.